Digging Up The Past |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
No visitor to Egypt can stand at the foot of any of the three giant pyramids of Gizeh (Giza), on the outskirts of Cairo, and not be overwhelmed by the immense size of those huge monuments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Who made the Pyramids & Why?
The first fact that becomes obvious to the inquiring mind is: These ancient people of Egypt were not primitive cave-men, arduously They were, in fact, highly intelligent, technically skilled organisers and The first possible clue we have to the origins of this remarkable people is There we find that the Hebrew word which is translated "Egypt" is "Misraim," and in Genesis 10:1-20 we are told that Misraim was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah.
So a fascinating fact is that today "Misr" is the name Egyptians continue to apply to themselves. Visitors to Egypt will notice the "MisrBank," the "Misr Travel Company," the "Misr Insurance Company." It is known that early settlers buried their dead in the hot dry sand, and due to the dry climate, (Cairo has an average annual rainfall of only about 50mm or 2 inches and in Luxor it very seldom rains at all), the bodies quickly dehydrated and were remarkably preserved. (One such body is on display in the British Museum in London).
This phenomenon, no doubt observed by the early Egyptians, may have supported the strong Egyptian belief in the immortality of the soul. What did the Egyptians believe, about Life & Death, Body & Spirit? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ancient InscriptionsWriting skills were developed early in the history of Egypt. The beautiful hieroglyphic writing was in use by the time of the first king of united Egypt. This complex script consisted of about 750 separate symbols or pictures, called hieroglyphs.
About 700 BC, a popular script called Demotic was invented. Writing in Egypt was done on either stone or papyrus. Reeds of the papyrus plant grew profusely in ancient Egypt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The hard outside layer was stripped off, the soft inner core of the papyrus was cut into thin strips, soaked in water, then laid side by side to the required width, then others laid on top at right-angles to the first strips.An absorbent material was then placed on top and the whole subjected to pressure for some days. The result was a tough but flexible sheet or scroll on which scribes wrote with a reed pen dipped in black or red ink.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Egyptian Scripts
By 400 AD, the hieroglyphic form of writing had fallen into disuse and within another 100 years, the Demotic had also been dropped. The Leyden Papyrus of the 3rd-century AD was a crucial key to the decipherment of the Demotic Ancient Egyptian dialect.
Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt in the year 1798. In August of the following year, 1799, one of his officers was repairing the fort of St Julien near the town of Rashid, or Rosetta. Here he found a large black stone, 112 by 82 centimetres and 25 centimetres thick. On it was a text inscribed in three scripts - Hieroglyphic at the top, Demotic in the centre and Greek at the bottom.
The Greek, which could be understood, was a record of the commemoration of the accession to the throne of the Greek king, Ptolemy V, in the year 196 BC. It was assumed that this was a trilingual inscription recording the same message in the three different scripts, and that by comparing the three, it would be possible to decipher the meaning of the then unknown Egyptian hieroglyphs. Before the French could do much work on the project, however, the British invaded Egypt and in 1801, the Rosetta Stone fell into British hands and was shipped to the British Museum, where it remains to this day. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Champollion Deciphers Hieroglyphs
The French had made a copy of the inscriptions on the Rosetta Stone, so both French and British scholars were able to work on the translation. An Englishman by the name of Thomas Young made some progress, but the hieroglyphs were finally deciphered by a young French genius by the name of Jean Francois Champollion. Champollion was born on December 23, 1790. He had a phenomenal memory and a flair for foreign languages. At the age of eleven, he was fluent in Latin, Greek and Hebrew. A school inspector named Fourier, who had accompanied Napoleon's expedition to Egypt, was impressed by the lad's extraordinary intelligence and invited him to his home, where he showed him his Egyptian collection. The boy was enchanted by his first sight of a papyrus manuscript with its hieroglyphic writing and asked, "Can anyone read this?" Fourier shook his head. "Then I am going to do it!" the boy confidently announced. At the age of twelve, the boy Champollion wrote his first book and at thirteen, began to study Arabic, Syrian, Chaldean and Coptic. He became so proficient with this last language that he wrote many of his journals in Coptic. Strange to say, he never did see the original Rosetta Stone, but at the age of eighteen, was given a copy of the inscription, which he began to study.
For the next fourteen years he grappled with its translation. His task was made more difficult because the top portion of the stone containing the hieroglyphs had been broken off and was missing. Only fourteen lines had survived and none of these was complete. In the year 1822, at the age of 32, Champollion was at last able to announce that he could read the mysterious Egyptian hieroglyphs. Six years later, just four years before his untimely death, he visited Egypt for the first time. But the key to the hieroglyphs had been found. The historical information written on the monuments and in the papyri could now be studied and scholars were able to go to work piecing together, at last, the history of ancient Egypt. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Boastful Monuments
Most of the monuments were made and inscribed by Pharaohs who were not concerned with making accurate historical records. Rather, they praised their own virtues and accomplishments. So it is not easy for scholars to determine accurate historical information from such biased writings. Scholars are often at variance in deciding how much of the inscriptions are really historical fact. This is in marked contrast to the records of the Bible, where historical information records not only the victories and the virtues but also the defeats and the moral lapses of even the most notable characters. Such impartial reporting is not found in the Egyptian or any other non-Biblical ancient records. So, from the records of the hieroglyphs, and from the writings of ancient historians like Herodotus, ("The Father of History") who visited Egypt about the middle of the fifth century BC, Manetho, an Egyptian priest who lived about 300 BC, and and from Josephus, the Jewish historian of the first century AD, let us now look at the history of the ancient Egyptian empire. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
River Nile - a Source of LifeHabitable Egypt consists primarily of the Nile valley, a narrow strip of fertile land averaging about twelve kilometres in width and extending about one thousand kilometres from south to north.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulers and DynastiesIn earliest Egyptian times, small towns and villages were ruled by local chiefs or kings. The first man to unite Upper and Lower Egypt under one monarchy was Menes, and he is regarded as the founder of the First Dynasty.
A dynasty is a line of kings where the crown is passed down from father to son for a number of generations.
In the Egyptian Museum Cairo is a black slate palette, 64 centimetres high, which is attributed to Narmer, usually identified with Menes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Zoser's Pyramid
The first king of the third dynasty was Zoser who was fortunate to have as his visier a genius by the name of Imhotep. This man was not only the remarkable architect and engineer who designed and built the first great pyramid, but was also a renowned physician. The kings of the first dynasty had tombs at Abydos and Saqqara, some 370km south of Cairo. They were buried under mastabas, which were mud brick buildings erected over their burial shafts. At Saqqara, Imhotep had a shaft 7 metres by 7 metres and 28 metres, dug deep down into the stone. At the bottom of this shaft was a burial vault and an extensive and complex series of passageways. The purpose of this maze of corridors is not known. Above these excavations Imhotep built a stone mastaba about 63 metres by 63 metres and 8 metres high. This was the first time stone had been used in the construction of a burial monument. This mastaba was faced with white limestone and was subsequently slightly enlarged. Above the mastaba, a four-tiered step pyramid was erected and later expanded to become a six-tier pyramid. It measured 125 metres from east to west, 108 metres from north to south and 62 metres in height. The whole was then completely encased in glistening white Tura limestone and must have presented a dazzling spectacle.
Where Imhotep got his idea from is a matter of speculation, but it seems highly probable that he borrowed it from the earlier civilisation of Mesopotamia where ziggurats, or temple towers, had been in use since the dawn of history. Probably the Tower of Babel, or Babylon, had been the first such tower.
These towers had been used as centres of worship, and Imhotep simply adapted the idea to a burial custom. Apparently grave robbers broke into the tomb and stole its contents, because no trace of Zoser's body has been found. Two fine alabaster coffins were discovered however, one of which contained the remains of a child.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Sneferu's Pyramids
With the beginning of the fourth dynasty came the development of the true pyramid. The first king of this dynasty was Sneferu, who, strange to say, seems to have been the builder of three pyramids. Why he should build three pyramids is also a matter of speculation, because not even a god-king can be buried in three places at one time. One plausible theory is that the first pyramid he built was the one at Meidum, about 64 kilometres south of Cairo. The outside casing of this pyramid lies as a huge mass of rubble at the foot of the pyramid. It has been suggested that rather than disintegrating over the centuries, it collapsed when the pyramid was almost completed. Perhaps, instead of trying to rebuild this pyramid, Sneferu ordered the second pyramid to be built at Dashur, some 45 kilometres to the north.
This is known as the Bent Pyramid because, while it starts out at an angle of 54 degrees (about the same angle as the Meidum Pyramid), about halfway up, its angle decreases to 43 degrees.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Khufu's Great Pyramid
There was an entrance (16.5 metres up the north face and slightly off-centre to the left) that had been subsequently filled-in and concealed. From this entrance, a corridor less than 120 centimetres by 120 centimetres slopes down at an angle of 26 degrees, first through the stones of the pyramid and then through the solid bedrock for a distance of 105 metres. Then it levels out and enters an unfinished burial chamber. Down the descending corridor, about 18 metres, another corridor of the same dimensions slopes upwards also at 26 degrees, for a distance of 39 metres. The entrance to this ascending corridor was subsequently plugged from above with three large stones and the mouth of the corridor was faced with a limestone slab so that the entrance could not be seen.
At the top of the ascending corridor a passage was cut horizontally into the exact centre of the pyramid, where it terminated in what is called the Queen's Chamber, though it is more likely that this was a place for a statue of the dead king.
In 1986 French scientists used stone-scanning equipment on the pyramid and discovered three chambers on the west side of the passage leading to the Queen’s Chamber. A TV lens inserted into one of these chambers revealed that it was empty. The purpose of these chambers is unknown.
Also from the top of the ascending corridor, a superbly constructed gallery sloped upwards 46 metres to the King's burial vault. This vault is lined with polished blocks of granite, floated down the Nile from Aswan, some 1000km upriver to the south. These blocks, weighing up to 15 tonnes each, are so perfectly squared and fitted together that it is not possible to fit a postcard between them. A large granite sarcophagus stands at the south end of this vault. It must have been deposited in the vault as the pyramid was being built because it is slightly larger than the ascending corridor. Two small "vents" slant upwards from the side of the vault and reach to the outside of the pyramid. These are not likely to be for ventilation purposes, as is commonly believed, for they would be totally inadequate for the workmen, and the dead king would not need to breathe. They were more likely to have been of ceremonial significance, perhaps to give the king's soul access to the outside world. Recently a small robot was made to crawl up the vent on the south side of the Queen’s Chamber and it is claimed that there is a stone portcullis door at the top.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Tomb Robbers
Just when the pyramid was broken into and relieved of its contents is not known. According to Muslim tradition, the Caliph Ma'mum, in the ninth century AD, believing that the pyramid contained fabulous treasures, ordered his workmen to burrow into it. Very logically, they started chiselling a passage into the centre of its north face, but as Khufu had the foresight to make his entrance off-centre, Ma'mum's men may have gone clean through the pyramid and out the other side without reward, had it not been for a stroke of good fortune. Their violent hammering dislodged the slab of stone that concealed the lower end of the ascending corridor, and it collapsed with a thud. The workmen, hearing this and accurately estimating the direction from which the noise came, changed direction and linked up with the ascending corridor. It is through this rough passage of Ma'mum that tourists enter the pyramid today.
Just to the east of Khufu's pyramid, were buried two huge funerary boats, no doubt intended to ferry the king's soul to the after-life. Nearby are some small pyramids called the Queen's pyramids. Just to the north of these small pyramids, archaeologist George Reisner in 1925 found the only undisturbed tomb of the old kingdom ever discovered. It lay at the bottom of a shaft 30 metres deep, and it belonged to Queen Hetepheres, the mother of King Khufu. The rich funerary equipment of this tomb is now in the Cairo Museum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Khafre's Pyramid
Khufu's son Khafre (Greek:"Chephren"), built the next great pyramid. It was only three metres lower than his predecessor's, but because its angle of height is slightly more, 52 degrees 20 minutes instead of 51 degrees 52 minutes, it is 14 1/2 metres smaller at the base and consequently contains a much smaller volume of stone. This pyramid still retains at its top some of the original limestone facing with which most of the pyramids were covered. This Tura limestone was greatly coveted by local builders, who denuded the pyramids for their building needs. To the east of Khafre's pyramid stands the giant Sphinx. It has the face of Khafre and the body of a crouching lion. It is 73 metres long and 20 metres high. The body was carved out of the solid rock that stood there on the site and the feet are made of bricks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Menkaure's Pyramid
Menkaure (Greek:"Mycerinus") was the builder of the third and much smaller pyramid of the Gizeh group. This pyramid occupies less than a quarter of the area covered by Khufu's pyramid. Its height was 66 metres when built. The upper portion was faced with white Tura limestone, but the lower sixteen layers were dressed with red granite from Aswan. Some of these layers have not been smoothed, thus indicating the method used to build all the pyramids, whereby all the facing was placed in position in the rough and then smoothed in sequence from the top down. The unsmoothed layers suggest that Menkaure died before his pyramid was quite finished.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Building the Pyramids
How did the Pharaohs build these giant edifices and manoeuvre these huge stones into position? Ideas about ingenious mechanical devices, UFO's, helicopters, or so-called pyramid power, are sheer speculation. There are no inscriptions, no wall paintings, to tell us how the pyramids were built. We have only one real clue, and that is from the first pylon of the temple of Karnak. The stones for this structure were dragged into position up a ramp made of sun-dried bricks. We know this because many of the bricks are still in position. How long did it take to build a pyramid? Herodotus states, "The work went on in three-monthly shifts, 100,000 men in a shift. It took ten years of this oppressive slave labour to build the track along which the blocks were hauled ... To build the pyramid itself took twenty years."
We know, however, that the Bent Pyramid was built in about two years. Inscriptions at the foot of the pyramid and half way up, judged by the dates of the king which are given, are only one year apart, so Khufu's pyramid may have been built in three or four years. Herodotus’ figure may be exaggerated but Dr. Mark Lehner recently excavated a huge bakery near the pyramids. He found a hearth, dough vats and bread pots. He estimates that the bakery was capable of producing enough bread to feed 30,000 workmen each day. There are the remains of about eighty pyramids in Egypt. None match the magnitude of the Gizeh group. Subsequent pyramids were made of smaller, roughly shaped stones, or even rubble, and faced with smooth limestone blocks. Nevertheless, thieves broke into all the pyramids and stole their treasures and the bodies of their kings.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faiyum OasisThe Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt had some powerful kings who developed the Faiyum, a fertile oasis supporting some two million people. The kings of this dynasty also built pyramids for their burials but they were of inferior construction. There were no more large pyramids built after the end of this dynasty. The 12th Dynasty ruled for about 200 years and early scholars dated the commencement of that dynasty to about 2,000 BC, but recently some scholars have questioned this date. Proposed revisions based on scholarly analysis, would in fact synchronise the slavery of Israel with the 12th Dynasty and the Exodus early in the 13th Dynasty, for which there is significant archaeological evidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Chronological Revolution
Peter James and four other scholars, in “Centuries of Darkness”, published 1991, claim that the dates of Ancient Egyptian history need to be reduced by some 250 years. (Page 318). In his forward to this book Colin Renfrew, Professor of Archaeology at Cambridge University wrote: “I feel that their critical analysis is right and that a chronological revolution is on its way”. (Page XVI). David Rohl in his book “A Test of Time” published in 1995, proposes an even more drastic reduction. Such a reduction could mean that the Biblical stories of Joseph, the migration of Jacob and his family to Egypt, and their subsequent slavery to Pharaoh, would have occurred during the 12th Dynasty, and for that there seems to be some significant archaeological evidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Exodus from KahunSir Flinders Petrie excavated in the Faiyum from 1880 onwards and in 1986 Dr Rosalie David of the Manchester Museum reviewed his work there. She published this review in "The Pyramid Builders of Ancient Egypt". Chapter 7 is titled "The Foreign Population at Kahun". On page 191 she wrote: "It is apparent that the Asiatics were present in the town (Kahun) in some numbers and this may have reflected the situation elsewhere in Egypt. It can be stated that these people were loosely classed as `Asiatics', although their exact homeland in Syria or Palestine cannot be determined ... The reason for their presence remains unclear".
Both Petrie and David assumed the traditional dates and did not associate these migrants with the Israelites, but by the revised dates the Israelites’ identification would be obvious. One curious discovery made by Petrie was of large "wooden boxes ... underneath the floors of many houses at Kahun. They contained babies, sometimes buried two or three to a box, and aged only a few months at death". This would be consistent with the record, that Pharaoh decreed that all the male children were to be killed at birth, (Exodus 1:16), though some mothers managed to protect their babes until they were a few months old, (Exodus 2:3).
The most striking feature of this slavery was their sudden disappearance from the scene. "The quantity, range and type of articles of everyday use which were left behind in the houses may indeed suggest that the departure was sudden and unpremeditated".
Moses would have been born during the reign of Amenemhat III who had no surviving sons, and only one daughter, Sobekneferu, who was childless. This would explain why she was bathing at the river instead of in her palace.
But when Moses was 40 years old he murdered an Egyptian who was ill- treating an Israelite. When Pharaoh heard of the incident Moses was obliged to flee. This left Amenemhat without an heir. When his daughter died the dynasty came to an end, to be replaced by the 13th Dynasty. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Plagues Strike Egypt
During the 13th dynasty, the ten plagues fell upon Egypt and the Exodus took place. The Pharaoh of the Exodus could have been Neferhotep I, who was the last king before the Hyksos entered Egypt. These plagues, as described in Exodus 7 to 12, must have devastated Egypt. A sage by the name of Ipuwer wrote on a papyrus a description of conditions at the time. This papyrus was found at Memphis, and is now in the Leiden Museum in Holland. In part it says: "Plague stalks through the land and blood is everywhere ... Nay, but dead men are buried in the river ... Nay, but the river is blood ... the stranger people from without are come into Egypt ... Nay, but corn hath perished everywhere". The Ancient Egyptians, pages 95-99.
The strangers would be the Hyksos who invaded the land at this time. Quoting from Manetho, Josephus wrote, "There was a king of ours whose name was Timaus. Under him it came to pass, I know not how, that God was averse to us, and there came, after a surprising manner, men of ignoble birth out of the eastern parts, and had boldness enough to make an expedition into our country, and with ease subdued it by force, yet without our hazarding a battle with them". Egypt usually maintained a well-trained standing army. It is hard to explain how the Hyksos could occupy Egypt without a battle, unless the Egyptian army had been destroyed in the Red Sea. (Exodus 14:28). Whatever the reason, the dark ages had fallen upon the land of Egypt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||